Almost every quantitative thesis includes a sentence like "the result was significant (p < 0.05)" โ and a striking number of students who write that sentence can't actually explain what it means. Here's a plain-English explanation, without the formal probability theory.
Imagine you're testing whether a new teaching method improves exam scores compared to the old method. You run the experiment and find that students using the new method scored higher on average. But there's a nagging question: could this difference have shown up just by random chance, even if the new method doesn't actually work any better?
The p-value answers exactly this question. It tells you: if the new method genuinely had no effect at all, how likely would it be to see a difference this large (or larger) purely by chance? A small p-value means "not very likely" โ which is taken as evidence that the difference you observed probably reflects a real effect, not just random noise.
There's nothing mathematically special about 0.05 โ it's a convention, popularized in early 20th-century statistics, that has simply stuck as the default threshold across most social science and education research. Some fields use stricter cutoffs (0.01 is common in medical research, for instance), and there's genuine, ongoing academic debate about whether relying on any single fixed cutoff is even good practice. Treat 0.05 as a widely accepted convention, not a law of nature.
A result can be statistically significant without being practically meaningful, and vice versa. If a new teaching method improves average scores by 0.3 marks out of 100, with p = 0.001 from a very large sample, that result is "significant" in the statistical sense โ but a 0.3-mark improvement may not be worth adopting in practice. Always look at the actual size of the effect (sometimes reported alongside the p-value as an "effect size"), not just whether it crossed the 0.05 line.
When writing up results, resist the temptation to treat p < 0.05 as a simple pass/fail stamp. Report the actual p-value (not just "p < 0.05"), report the effect size where possible, and discuss what the result actually means in practical terms for your research question โ not just whether it cleared a conventional statistical threshold.
Related: Correlation vs Regression ยท Scholar's Corner overview ยท ESAR Scholars Academy Home